Posts Tagged ‘Politics’

Leadership Challenges for the New Year

Wednesday, December 28th, 2011

What can we do to help each other face the challenges of an economic climate that changes with the weather?

There are no safe havens. Sears has been around forever and is closing stores. Old brands are dying, yet new ones will always come along to replace them.

 

What do we want from our leaders to help us with the tides of change?

The following article gives food for thought. So does my response. Enjoy.

What does leadership look like?

Glenn Llopis

Bringing the immigrant perspective to business leaders

Leadership Contrast: Men and Power

Thursday, December 22nd, 2011

 

Lots of deaths of powerful men in the past year. Many have been dictators who had tons of money and little integrity.

 

 

 

Think about these 3 questions:

  1. Ever wonder why we permit these men to “rule” us?
  2. Ever wonder why millions will stay quiet and let those who have found the path to brute power to keep it?
  3. Ever think about how we can make a better difference and make a better world?

Vaclav Havel was an actor, a playwright, an artist. Maybe there is a clue there. The arts are a way to the heart. Even the word eARTh gives us a clue. Expressing oneself through music, movement, painting, poetry, theater touches the deep core of who we are. Maybe, just maybe, we should be finding leaders who have a different kind of power to lead us. Havel had that mysterious and important blend. What about you?

Havel: Hero Of Our Time

Click above to read the article by Barry Wood, Economics Journalist at HuffPost World.

Home Alone?

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

This insightful blog brings up a multitude of questions about active leadership.

What do you do when things are tough and the “kids” are fighting?

Betsy's Page

-This is leadership?  by Betsy Newmark

http://betsyspage.blogspot.com/2011/11/this-is-leadership.html

Real Leadership, Robert Reich, and Ending Apathy

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

The “new” politics is happening. It is a return, or maybe a new turn to participatory human scale democracy. It is what is blossoming all around this country, all around the world. Modern technology is being used for good, not just fun or stimulation. The world is coming together in a new way, and as Robert Reich states, apathy is taking a hike!

The wave of involvement includes local grassroots initiatives, a redefining of power, and a way of getting to the core of issues that impact all of us. This is not about the 99%, it really is about the human desire for reaching potential and being altruistic; helping each other.

The “new’ politics is expressed by an “organic” worldview; it is inclusive rather than exclusive. The balance is between “CARE and DARE” which is the meeting place of male and female ways of thinking and being.

It is in everyone’s nature to care and it is in everyone’s nature to dare, to take risks and make a difference. The evolving worldview that is being shaken loose is seen in the camaraderie of young and elder, diverse folks from diverse backgrounds who no longer are willing to be told what to do and how to live.

The statements from Berkeley California to Manhattan New York are one and the same. We all matter. The perspective is eclectic in detail, yet, generally affirms the human need for far more that material well-being alone.  There is an exciting emphasis on holistic values that are life affirming and involve both inner trust in one’s deep beliefs of connectedness as well as group wisdom that we are all connected and no one wins unless we all do.

This is the core of what we teach in our Total Leadership Connections four session program. Come join us in the new wave of transformational leadership. Our new program begins in March 2012 and promises to be amazing and important at this time in the way the world is turning.

 

Gabby Gifford: Leadership in Action

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

Watching this amazing woman return to Congress during these contentious and dreary days of haggling sent a beam of light through the room where the polarization seems to never end.

Her blond hair is darkened and cut short; she is extremely thin and with minimal make-up, yet, beautiful in her simplicity. She is a walking miracle.

I can only wonder what her presence means to those she has worked with. I watched the replay of her waving and nodding and for a few moments attempted to walk in her shoes. I began to wonder if I would be capable of the tedious climb she has maneuvered and continues since that gruesome day in Tucson so many months ago.

Gifford is a model of tenacity. Nancy Pelosi pointed to the recuperating lady and said she is a model for our daughters. I concur. Yet, there are others. We sadly still seem to put the celebrity of those who make noise for no reason front and center. The Snookies and Gosselins of reality television are there. How many mothers can point to the meaningless characters on the reality shows and then point to our daughters and say “not on my watch?”

We need to keep people of courage and dignity front and center as models for our young. Who would you put there with Congresswoman Gifford?

Sarah Palin, Communists, and What it Means to be Exceptional

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

The following article is one to sink our teeth into and really look at what a word really means. We are going to hear tons about “American Exceptionalism” as the campaign heats up. We have an opportunity to question the rhetoric rather than blindly accept the slogans and chants. This is a great one to start with. Hey, if you think you are exceptional, you may want to dig down and really figure out why. In my mind we are all exceptional just by the fact we are here on planet earth. Exceptionalism, and exceptional are ego words that can do more harm than good. Let me know what you think, especially if you exceptionally disagree with me!

USA 3.0 by Harry Shearer, contributor, Huffington Post

LONDON — As I write this I’m flying back to America, specifically New Orleans, to celebrate July 4 by watching fireworks over the Mississippi River. I say that right up here at the top to establish my Yank bonafides. In addition, my parents sought out this country as a refuge (one denied, it should be noted, to many of their equally desperate compatriots), so I’ve never stopped being grateful that, at least for them, for that special moment, the golden door was open.

But we’re three trillion dollars down, the latest reports say, in trying to — to what? Protect ourselves? Export freedom? Make the world safe for our oil interests? It’s hard to know. This America 2.0 would be impossible for the Founders to recognize, even with folks running around with the banner of the Tea Party. After all, the Founders, slave-owners mostly, wouldn’t see themselves in Michele Bachmann’s characterization. Nor would they recognize a country that thinks nation-building in the graveyard of empires is the spunky little republic they established.

Click Here to read the full article.

My Response:
Thanks for suggesting that we look at that ego based word “exception­al” or in this case, “exception­alism”. Interestin­gly enough, that word was first used by members of the American Communist Party in the 1920′s (Let’s pause while Sarah Palin gags!!). What the communists thought set America apart was its abundance of natural resources (yes to that), it’s absence of rigid class distinctio­ns (huh) and the possibilit­y it could avoid the need to use war to keep itself strong (comments anyone).

In my work as an executive coach I come across way too many leaders who are stuck feeling and thinking they are exceptiona­l and sadly what that translates to is “being above an ethical code of conduct”.

We have to thank the conservati­ves on the right and our communist brethren of old for keeping the image of American exceptiona­lism alive. And thanks to Harry for putting the term under a microscope­.

 

Coming Together

Thursday, January 13th, 2011


Tragedies often pull us together, yet, unless we can learn new ways the tragedy sits in us like a knot and we end up judging, blaming and isolating. We have a small window of opportunity to start a deeper, more meaningful dialogue about the why and how we treat each other in an open society. The need is to understand what healthy boundaries means and how we help our children grow into responsible adults who care about each other. It is too late for Jared Loughner and yet, there are so many Jareds waiting to do harm. It is time to stand together and ask how we can all help and get a new dialogue going. The following is a call for our leaders to stand together whatever their political views and find a better way with all of us!

Obama, Boehner Face Leadership test in Wake of Arizona Tragedy

WASHINGTON — On opposite sides of the political spectrum, President Barack Obama and new House Speaker John Boehner suddenly face the same challenge: rise above the anger, suspicion and hostility of their liberal and conservative bases to help a rattled nation deal with the deadly outburst of violence in Arizona.

But what comes after the easy moment of silence?

For now, both men are stepping past the question of what role, if any, the vitriol of the past election campaign played in Saturday’s shooting rampage that left Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in critical condition and six others dead. Instead, they’re grappling with the high-stakes test the tragedy presents over how to lead the nation going forward.

Obama, the Democratic president halfway through his term, has spoken of his regret for not having raised the level of political discourse in a deeply divided nation. Boehner, the newly installed Republican House speaker, is second in line to the presidency but has yet to shape his role as a national figure.

For both men, the path ahead is perilous, filled with the political risk of alienating parts of the stunned electorate.

The parties’ rank-and-file supporters handle the nuts and bolts of electoral politics – fundraising, door-knocking and the like. But they also are sources of the red-hot rhetoric that inflames passions, with right- and left-leaning talk radio, cable networks and Internet sites their outlets of choice.

Those Republican and Democratic foot soldiers may not appreciate calls from the top to tone it down, though the center of the electorate, detesting ideological warfare and wanting those in Washington to work together, certainly will.

“All of us are still grieving and in shock from the tragedy that took place,” Obama said Monday, calling for healing and sidestepping any potentially divisive issues. He is to travel to Tucson, Ariz., on Wednesday to speak at a memorial service for the victims, the White House said.

“It’s going to be important, I think, for the country as a whole, as well as the people of Arizona, to feel as if we are speaking directly to our sense of loss, but also speaking to our hopes for the future and how out of this tragedy we can come together as a stronger nation,” Obama said.
How – or whether – to do that is an unsettled question among newly empowered Republicans on Capitol Hill.

Boehner has wide latitude, said former House historian Raymond Smock.

“I think he has the potential to have a very important role in how Congress responds and the public tone that is set,” said Smock, director of the Robert C. Byrd Center for Legislative Studies.

For now, Boehner is responding as head of the House, not the leader of just one party. In a conference call over the weekend, he told lawmakers of both parties that an attack on one member of Congress is an attack on all.

“What is critical is that we stand together at this dark time as one body,” he said. “We need to rally around our wounded colleague, the families of the fallen and the people of Arizona’s 8th District. And, frankly, we need to rally around each other.”

In one quick action, House Republicans postponed a vote this week that was certain to be divisive on repealing Obama’s health care overhaul. Debate over it last summer prompted threats and vandalism against lawmakers, including Giffords.

Instead, the House was poised to take up a resolution Wednesday supporting Giffords and the other shooting victims.

In Columbus, Ohio, on Monday, Boehner attended the swearing-in of a longtime friend, new Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

“It was a horrible tragedy,” Boehner said of the Tucson shootings. “I’m not going to say anything more than that.”

None of that prevented finger-pointing from the far sides of the political spectrum. Both the left and the right hurled accusations that the other was inciting violence. The suspect’s political leanings weren’t clear.

Some Democrats cast blame on the right-leaning tea party movement and Sarah Palin. She had told her followers “Don’t retreat; reload” last year and used crosshairs to denote congressional districts, including Giffords’, where she wanted Republicans to win.

Conservatives, in turn, said the left is just as nasty in its rhetoric. They pointed out that it was Obama who declared during the 2008 presidential campaign, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”

Over the weekend, Obama said, “What Americans do at times of tragedy is to come together and support each other.”

The man accused of the shootings, 22-year-old Jared Loughner, appeared in court late Monday. He was ordered held without bail.

The night before the violence, Giffords was trying to show a peaceful path.

In an e-mail to a friend in Kentucky discussing how to “promote centrism and moderation,” she congratulated Republican Secretary of State Trey Grayson on his new position at Harvard University.

“After you get settled, I would love to talk about what we can do to promote centrism and moderation,” Giffords wrote. “I am one of only 12 Dems left in a GOP district (the only woman) and think that we need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down.”

Are We Ready to Change Our Ways

Monday, January 10th, 2011

ChangeIt is really time to let the pattern of avoidance of conflict fall away and transform it into one of being the initiator. We need to step up to the plate and call those who are making big bucks from hatred and empty noise to task. The following is an excellent blog and it is certainly time we all take a stand for decency, justice, and a high level of integrity.

Can Pathological Politics Be Reversed?

By: Kathleen Reardon on Huffington Post

Each of us is at least 75 percent responsible for how others treat us. If they are disdainful and we do not respond in a way that causes them to change their tone and attitude, then we essentially encourage them to continue to berate us.

This is what Americans do when they listen to shock jocks and others whose larger purpose in life is to draw attention and wealth to themselves by spewing hatred and lies.

When we don’t expect support for assertions, anyone can convince us of anything. They foul our environment with vitriol seeping downward to our children where bullying is becoming more and more prevalent.

We can choose to extricate ourselves from the URPs (unwanted repetitive episodes) of vile talk. And expect the same from our leaders. First, we must notice that we’re in such destructive patterns — that we’re part of the problem. Only then is it possible to take the actions necessary to end them. Does this mean doing away with criticism? It does not. Democracy depends on constructive criticism to avoid dangerous excesses. It does mean honestly distinguishing between passionate disagreements and personal attacks. It means calling on those who by distortions of fact endeavor to turn political opponents into enemies

On Meet The Press Sunday, the focus was on ways to make politics more civil. Yet, those interviewed did not directly blame shock jocks who are spreading hatred for a living. These congressmen and senators were mistaking such omission as a form of civility — keeping the dialogue pure. In so doing, however, they abdicated their 75 percent responsibility for bringing about change. They were essentially saying, “Let’s be more polite to each other” rather than “Let’s bring to task those people whose bombastic, odious, contemptuous words lower us all and elicit hatred and revenge for fabricated offense.”

A simple agreement to be more civil will not work for long in the House or Senate. Members need to confront their contributions to the incivility and pathological politics that has become the norm — even if that contribution has only been one of tolerance.

Our country’s politicians are caught up in URPs that are not about to go away merely by agreeing to disagree. Family members in therapy do not suddenly turn around their dysfunctional patterns because they want things to improve. It’s a step-by-step process. In Washington, this will require reminding each other that spewing hatred as well as praising and catering to those who do — especially to get votes — is a despicable practice.

Learning to call people on their hateful rhetoric is a required first step. Otherwise it’s all simply a temporary papering over of ugliness that will surely show through again in short order.

For the rest of us, breaking the URP requires refusing to listen to shock jocks whose hateful rants lack any semblance of credible support. Our own URPs, being entertained by hatred, contribute to continued vile discourse. Each of us has a role to play in bringing about greater civility — at least 75 percent responsibility. Doing so has little to do with politeness and far more to do with refusing to engage in gratuitous, hateful hyperbole and rejecting overtly those who do.

Kathleen also blogs at bardscove (www.bardscove.com) and comebacksatwork and is on Twitter. @comebackskid

 

My response to article:

I am at a lunch break while facilitati­ng a senior leadership program and continue to be amazed and saddened at the number of conflict avoiders there are in high level positions. Most would rather lie on a bed of nails than take on loud mouth dissenters­.

I believe that we are all 100% responsibl­e for what is going on in this country and agree with Reardon we need to take a stand and hold the “shock jocks” responsibl­e for their ways of dissenting through hatred and superficia­l jargon.

Going deeper, we do not teach conflict resolution skills in most of our schools and most of us, as indicated by the senior leaders I am with today, never learned that at home.

We need to teach this vital skill, more of an art and a craft, beginning in elementary school and at the core is the following message “telling the truth is not spilling your guts”.

Hopefully thre tragedy in Tucson will be a major wake up call for our nation.

Leadership Strategies: To Live Life Fully

Friday, October 22nd, 2010

Strategy to Living LifeSometimes I get super depressed when I turn on the television for a moment of diversion. I quickly turn the tube off. It is full of shoot to kill or who done it, that are mostly a waste of good time. I then go back to the web, more interesting. Arianna Huffington’s blog is one of the best and this article about most interesting people who are making a difference was uplifting. Enjoy and pass it along.

 

 

100 Game Changers, Millions of Votes, Here are your Ultimate 12

By: Arianna Huffington

Last month we announced HuffPost’s 2010 Game Changers — 100 innovators, visionaries, and leaders who are changing the way we look at the world and the way we live in it. And we asked you to weigh in on who the Ultimate Game Changer is in each of our 12 categories: Politics, Entertainment, Style, Tech, Business, Travel, Green, Sports, Food, Education, Media, and Impact (where we salute those changing the game when it comes to philanthropy and service).

The response was tremendous. You cast over 3 million votes. Thank you!

Now it’s time to reveal your picks for the Ultimate 12.

They are an eclectic mix of those accustomed to the spotlight and those who have been working under the radar. And there were more than a few surprises. For instance, despite the presence of a number of superstar athletes in Sports, you voted in Amy Palmiero-Winters & Catherine Hughes, two below-the-knee amputees who show that disabilities need not be an end to dreams of athletic triumph.

And while our Style Game Changers included style and fashion icons such as Tom Ford and Paulina Porizkova, and red carpet regulars Ashley and Mary Kate Olson, you selected Joe Bozich, who runs a garment factory in the Dominican Republic that pays its workers a living wage.

So check out the slideshow below to see who the HuffPost community selected as the Ultimate Game Changers.

And it won’t be long before we start putting together next year’s list of Game Changers, so be on the lookout for those people who are pushing the envelope in their fields — who are willing to look at things and take the risk of saying, “I think I have a better way.”

Congratulations again to our 100 HuffPost Game Changers, who we will be celebrating at a party next Thursday (watch for pictures and coverage of the event). And a special round of virtual applause for the Ultimate 12.

Sylvia Lafair’s Comment:
Hooray for people who put passion before profits. These winners are examples of how to live a life that is more than just a bunch of expensive toys. My dream would be to attend a dinner party with this amazing crew and listen. They are the change agents that are able to get beyond the superficial and the indulgent.
Every kid in school should have to pick one of the winners and research a life that is being lived well. THESE ARE THE ROLE MODELS FOR THE FUTURE!

Voting Badge
Brought to you by: Online MBA Rankings

Taking a Stand

Monday, October 18th, 2010

This is one of the most curious and important mid-term elections in quite a while. Sometimes I think it’s been scripted by Steven Spielberg for his next film. I do not ever remember so many individuals running for office with such extreme abilities. I am going to be more vocal, more active, the way I was in the past. I agree with Arianna Huffington that change must come from us and if we don’t create a more user friendly world there is no one to blame but ourselves.

Choking on its contrived objectivity…
by: Arianna Huffington

We finally found out the real problem with the mainstream media: They’re agnostic on sanity.

That’s the only conclusion that can be drawn from the refusal of mainstream-media organizations to allow their employees to attend Jon Stewart’s Rally to Restore Sanity on Oct. 30 in Washington, D.C. That’s right, in a showdown between nonpartisan sanity and partisan madness, the traditional media have boldly decided to… not take a stand.

It started with Ellen Weiss, NPR’s Senior Vice President for News, sending a memo to NPR employees forbidding them from attending the rally. The policy was clarified in a NPR blog post by Dana Davis Rehm. “Their rallies will be perceived as political by many, whatever we think,” she wrote.

Heaven forbid! Clearly if someone is going to perceive something NPR does as “political,” it’s best not to do it — even if it’s not actually political. Better to let what’s acceptable be defined by the most extreme elements than be perceived as “political” — and to keep a pristine reputation by not taking a stand on sanity and reasonableness.

NPR was joined by the Washington Post, which sent out this statement to its newsroom managers:

Events, like those organized by Glenn Beck or involving Jon Stewart and Steven [sic] Colbert, are political, and therefore Post newsroom employees may not participate. By participate, we mean that Post newsroom employees cannot in any way put themselves in a position that could be construed as supporting (or opposing) that cause.

Got that? Can’t be seen supporting sanity, but must be seen drawing a ludicrous equivalence between Glenn Beck and Jon Stewart! The Post does say that it permits “observing… watching and listening from the sidelines.” You know, just like the press — with some very honorable exceptions — did during the run-up to the Iraq War. Or the financial crisis. Or the housing crisis.

Similar statements have been put out by ABC News, CBS News, AP, Politico and the New York Times.

Actually, this media groupthink explains a lot — including why we find ourselves in a time and place in our country in which a rally to restore sanity is even necessary. The media didn’t take positions on the most insane events of the last ten years, so, the thinking seems to be, why start now? It certainly explains why, as our political process becomes more and more insane, the media act like guests at a dinner party ignoring the fact that the guy sitting at the end of the table is proceeding to set it on fire. You want to say, “Uh, yeah, the wine is very good, thanks, but does anybody else notice that guy over there with the gasoline and the Zippo lighter?” But pointing out the insanity would be “partisan.” Better not to rock the boat… even as it’s sinking.

We’ve seen it again and again: In the name of “objectivity,” the media pretend that every issue has two sides, and that both deserve equal weight. For the Pontius Pilate press, washing its hands of responsibility, the best route is to stand on the sidelines — leaving the question of “what is true” to the public.

It should go without saying: Not taking a stand is, in fact, taking a stand. Fortunately, more than 200,000 people have already pledged to take a stand, having signed up to attend at the rally’s Facebook page.

And we here at The Huffington Post will be driving thousands of them from New York to D.C. and the rally. As you might have heard, in a moment of rational exuberance during my recent Daily Show appearance, I pledged that HuffPost would provide buses for people who needed a ride. At the moment, more than 10,000 people have signed up to allow HuffPost to drive them sane. We think of them as our Sanity Riders. Yes, that will be a lot of buses — but there’s a lot of sanity to restore.

We’ve known for a while that if we’re going to pull ourselves out of the various messes we’re in, the answers are not going to come from Washington. And now we know they are not going to come from the major media either. They’ll be on the sidelines, just as they were as the fringe ideas and extreme rhetoric that have taken over our political conversation became more and more unhinged.

Taking a stand for sanity is not a partisan position. It’s neither right nor left. It’s reasonable. So stroll over to your window (no need to rush), open it, and, without shouting, repeat after me: “I’m sensible as hell… and I’m not going to take it any longer than is reasonable.”

For more on the media’s stance on (not) taking part in the rally, check out HuffPost’s Jason Linkins, our go-to guy on all things Rally to Restore Sanity. “I’m not surprised by the stupidity of it all,” he writes. “I’m just surprised by the way they boldly, proudly, fetishize the stupidity.” Me too, Jason, me too.

Sylvia’s Comment:

Great post! I decided to go to Washington for the rally after watching Arianna on Stewart’s show. I’ll drive in from Pa. but was ready to go to Manhattan just to be on one of the buses. I also plan to go to a Tea Party meeting before election eve. I’ve been watching from the sidelines, shaking my head at the sad, wasteful polarization that has become our country and decided its time to listen more deeply, stop judging and start participating more actively. That NPR is so paralyzed along with the other media outlets shows how fear can win. I keep hearing my daughter who is doing a documentary about the walls we build to keep people in or keep people out saying “S/he who remains silent is guilty too” when she returned from Palestine/Israel and Juarez Mexico. Power to the people is going to mean having the discipline to dialogue with each other, a skill we need to practice with intention.

Voting Badge
Brought to you by: Online MBA Rankings