Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Leadership Challenges for the New Year

Wednesday, December 28th, 2011

What can we do to help each other face the challenges of an economic climate that changes with the weather?

There are no safe havens. Sears has been around forever and is closing stores. Old brands are dying, yet new ones will always come along to replace them.

 

What do we want from our leaders to help us with the tides of change?

The following article gives food for thought. So does my response. Enjoy.

What does leadership look like?

Glenn Llopis

Bringing the immigrant perspective to business leaders

Leadership Contrast: Men and Power

Thursday, December 22nd, 2011

 

Lots of deaths of powerful men in the past year. Many have been dictators who had tons of money and little integrity.

 

 

 

Think about these 3 questions:

  1. Ever wonder why we permit these men to “rule” us?
  2. Ever wonder why millions will stay quiet and let those who have found the path to brute power to keep it?
  3. Ever think about how we can make a better difference and make a better world?

Vaclav Havel was an actor, a playwright, an artist. Maybe there is a clue there. The arts are a way to the heart. Even the word eARTh gives us a clue. Expressing oneself through music, movement, painting, poetry, theater touches the deep core of who we are. Maybe, just maybe, we should be finding leaders who have a different kind of power to lead us. Havel had that mysterious and important blend. What about you?

Havel: Hero Of Our Time

Click above to read the article by Barry Wood, Economics Journalist at HuffPost World.

Home Alone?

Tuesday, November 22nd, 2011

This insightful blog brings up a multitude of questions about active leadership.

What do you do when things are tough and the “kids” are fighting?

Betsy's Page

-This is leadership?  by Betsy Newmark

http://betsyspage.blogspot.com/2011/11/this-is-leadership.html

Real Leadership, Robert Reich, and Ending Apathy

Thursday, November 17th, 2011

The “new” politics is happening. It is a return, or maybe a new turn to participatory human scale democracy. It is what is blossoming all around this country, all around the world. Modern technology is being used for good, not just fun or stimulation. The world is coming together in a new way, and as Robert Reich states, apathy is taking a hike!

The wave of involvement includes local grassroots initiatives, a redefining of power, and a way of getting to the core of issues that impact all of us. This is not about the 99%, it really is about the human desire for reaching potential and being altruistic; helping each other.

The “new’ politics is expressed by an “organic” worldview; it is inclusive rather than exclusive. The balance is between “CARE and DARE” which is the meeting place of male and female ways of thinking and being.

It is in everyone’s nature to care and it is in everyone’s nature to dare, to take risks and make a difference. The evolving worldview that is being shaken loose is seen in the camaraderie of young and elder, diverse folks from diverse backgrounds who no longer are willing to be told what to do and how to live.

The statements from Berkeley California to Manhattan New York are one and the same. We all matter. The perspective is eclectic in detail, yet, generally affirms the human need for far more that material well-being alone.  There is an exciting emphasis on holistic values that are life affirming and involve both inner trust in one’s deep beliefs of connectedness as well as group wisdom that we are all connected and no one wins unless we all do.

This is the core of what we teach in our Total Leadership Connections four session program. Come join us in the new wave of transformational leadership. Our new program begins in March 2012 and promises to be amazing and important at this time in the way the world is turning.

 

New Patterns of Leadership

Sunday, October 2nd, 2011

How does a social epidemic start? How can it be used for real and lasting change to occur? What are we yearning for anyway? The sparks from Occupy Wall Street are spreading. What is the organizing principle? The media says the folks who protest and march are not clear. Yes, they are. It is about something so basic it is almost impossible to consider. It is about new ways of organizing the human enterprise. We all need to participate. It’s not about finger pointing, it’s about a vital redesign. What a great time to be alive. Let’s all add our best thinking and create something amazing that will include everyone. What can you offer to this important moment in history?

Wall Street protests lead to hundreds of arrests on Brooklyn Bridge

Occupy Wall Street is yet another thread in the new social fabric we are all weaving; a different pattern with impressive signs for change in how we relate to each other, to the environment, and frame our basic social order. The plea is to go deeper in our thinking, not to stay in the superficial, symptoms category of right and wrong, good and bad. We can help each other find a way out of the materialistic misery that envelopes all of us, from the very rich to the very poor. Its about you, its about me, and its about time.

The deepest concern that is finally coming to light is how we have been alienated from each other. Social media is here to help us connect. The tweets of encouragement for those on the Brooklyn Bridge were from around the world. There is no more hiding and ignoring. The opposite of alienation is connection. In our Total Leadership Connections program that is the core teaching “we are all connected and no one wins unless we all do”. The dictators around the world are learning this, now those who have taken more than their fair share on Wall Street are in the world classroom.

Leadership and Democracy

Thursday, September 29th, 2011

Sean Penn, a great Academy Award winning actor is also a passionate activist. I spent time mulling over a statement he made while I was catching up on the news on the plane coming from Las Vegas.  I was riveted watching a program about what a democracy requires.

“Democracy is no democracy without participation” was an important quote from Sean Penn. I sat thinking about leadership and what it takes for leaders to activate our participatory neurons. Plane rides are great places to zone out and also to have quiet time to think.

My reverie brought me back to sixth grade where I was elected the Vice President of our class. “What do I do?” I queried. “Not much” was the reply from the President. He made sure to inform me that HE would be in the limelight and I would simply be there, well, in case he got sick or there was something boring he did not want to participate in.

It was a time before “the girls” took strong stands. I looked at dear Bill and smiled, “I guess I’ll take my cues from you.” “Yeah, good idea” was his reply.

Even at the age of twelve the conditioning to let others dictate behavior, what is and is not allowed, what can and can’t be done is deep. And I was one of the question askers, one of the GUTSY ones.

It did not take long before I started to create some waves at school. “Why” I asked our teacher did the President have all the power and I, the Vice President had none? (Do you think Joe Biden asks this also?).

I got little from my teacher who just wanted us to “behave”. I was told that was just the way things were and to accept things as they were. What was so perfect was that Bill became majorly annoying in school and before I knew it there were rumblings of impeachment. That would mean I would be President. Sounded good to me!

Now, as I look back I think about what a major learning time that could have been for all of us twelve-year-old kids. Instead, the teacher called a meeting of the “rabble rousers” and told them you cannot impeach a President for liking his job and for showing off. We did not have a leg to stand on and thus the delight about impeachment soon faded away.

What also faded away was our fascination with power, personalities, and politics. Most of us became uninvolved and the school year ended with little learning about how to really participate in a democracy. What we learned was what so many of us took into the workplace, which is how to behave properly and be politically correct.

Gabby Gifford: Leadership in Action

Tuesday, August 2nd, 2011

Watching this amazing woman return to Congress during these contentious and dreary days of haggling sent a beam of light through the room where the polarization seems to never end.

Her blond hair is darkened and cut short; she is extremely thin and with minimal make-up, yet, beautiful in her simplicity. She is a walking miracle.

I can only wonder what her presence means to those she has worked with. I watched the replay of her waving and nodding and for a few moments attempted to walk in her shoes. I began to wonder if I would be capable of the tedious climb she has maneuvered and continues since that gruesome day in Tucson so many months ago.

Gifford is a model of tenacity. Nancy Pelosi pointed to the recuperating lady and said she is a model for our daughters. I concur. Yet, there are others. We sadly still seem to put the celebrity of those who make noise for no reason front and center. The Snookies and Gosselins of reality television are there. How many mothers can point to the meaningless characters on the reality shows and then point to our daughters and say “not on my watch?”

We need to keep people of courage and dignity front and center as models for our young. Who would you put there with Congresswoman Gifford?

Sarah Palin, Communists, and What it Means to be Exceptional

Tuesday, July 5th, 2011

The following article is one to sink our teeth into and really look at what a word really means. We are going to hear tons about “American Exceptionalism” as the campaign heats up. We have an opportunity to question the rhetoric rather than blindly accept the slogans and chants. This is a great one to start with. Hey, if you think you are exceptional, you may want to dig down and really figure out why. In my mind we are all exceptional just by the fact we are here on planet earth. Exceptionalism, and exceptional are ego words that can do more harm than good. Let me know what you think, especially if you exceptionally disagree with me!

USA 3.0 by Harry Shearer, contributor, Huffington Post

LONDON — As I write this I’m flying back to America, specifically New Orleans, to celebrate July 4 by watching fireworks over the Mississippi River. I say that right up here at the top to establish my Yank bonafides. In addition, my parents sought out this country as a refuge (one denied, it should be noted, to many of their equally desperate compatriots), so I’ve never stopped being grateful that, at least for them, for that special moment, the golden door was open.

But we’re three trillion dollars down, the latest reports say, in trying to — to what? Protect ourselves? Export freedom? Make the world safe for our oil interests? It’s hard to know. This America 2.0 would be impossible for the Founders to recognize, even with folks running around with the banner of the Tea Party. After all, the Founders, slave-owners mostly, wouldn’t see themselves in Michele Bachmann’s characterization. Nor would they recognize a country that thinks nation-building in the graveyard of empires is the spunky little republic they established.

Click Here to read the full article.

My Response:
Thanks for suggesting that we look at that ego based word “exception­al” or in this case, “exception­alism”. Interestin­gly enough, that word was first used by members of the American Communist Party in the 1920′s (Let’s pause while Sarah Palin gags!!). What the communists thought set America apart was its abundance of natural resources (yes to that), it’s absence of rigid class distinctio­ns (huh) and the possibilit­y it could avoid the need to use war to keep itself strong (comments anyone).

In my work as an executive coach I come across way too many leaders who are stuck feeling and thinking they are exceptiona­l and sadly what that translates to is “being above an ethical code of conduct”.

We have to thank the conservati­ves on the right and our communist brethren of old for keeping the image of American exceptiona­lism alive. And thanks to Harry for putting the term under a microscope­.

 

Coming Together

Thursday, January 13th, 2011


Tragedies often pull us together, yet, unless we can learn new ways the tragedy sits in us like a knot and we end up judging, blaming and isolating. We have a small window of opportunity to start a deeper, more meaningful dialogue about the why and how we treat each other in an open society. The need is to understand what healthy boundaries means and how we help our children grow into responsible adults who care about each other. It is too late for Jared Loughner and yet, there are so many Jareds waiting to do harm. It is time to stand together and ask how we can all help and get a new dialogue going. The following is a call for our leaders to stand together whatever their political views and find a better way with all of us!

Obama, Boehner Face Leadership test in Wake of Arizona Tragedy

WASHINGTON — On opposite sides of the political spectrum, President Barack Obama and new House Speaker John Boehner suddenly face the same challenge: rise above the anger, suspicion and hostility of their liberal and conservative bases to help a rattled nation deal with the deadly outburst of violence in Arizona.

But what comes after the easy moment of silence?

For now, both men are stepping past the question of what role, if any, the vitriol of the past election campaign played in Saturday’s shooting rampage that left Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in critical condition and six others dead. Instead, they’re grappling with the high-stakes test the tragedy presents over how to lead the nation going forward.

Obama, the Democratic president halfway through his term, has spoken of his regret for not having raised the level of political discourse in a deeply divided nation. Boehner, the newly installed Republican House speaker, is second in line to the presidency but has yet to shape his role as a national figure.

For both men, the path ahead is perilous, filled with the political risk of alienating parts of the stunned electorate.

The parties’ rank-and-file supporters handle the nuts and bolts of electoral politics – fundraising, door-knocking and the like. But they also are sources of the red-hot rhetoric that inflames passions, with right- and left-leaning talk radio, cable networks and Internet sites their outlets of choice.

Those Republican and Democratic foot soldiers may not appreciate calls from the top to tone it down, though the center of the electorate, detesting ideological warfare and wanting those in Washington to work together, certainly will.

“All of us are still grieving and in shock from the tragedy that took place,” Obama said Monday, calling for healing and sidestepping any potentially divisive issues. He is to travel to Tucson, Ariz., on Wednesday to speak at a memorial service for the victims, the White House said.

“It’s going to be important, I think, for the country as a whole, as well as the people of Arizona, to feel as if we are speaking directly to our sense of loss, but also speaking to our hopes for the future and how out of this tragedy we can come together as a stronger nation,” Obama said.
How – or whether – to do that is an unsettled question among newly empowered Republicans on Capitol Hill.

Boehner has wide latitude, said former House historian Raymond Smock.

“I think he has the potential to have a very important role in how Congress responds and the public tone that is set,” said Smock, director of the Robert C. Byrd Center for Legislative Studies.

For now, Boehner is responding as head of the House, not the leader of just one party. In a conference call over the weekend, he told lawmakers of both parties that an attack on one member of Congress is an attack on all.

“What is critical is that we stand together at this dark time as one body,” he said. “We need to rally around our wounded colleague, the families of the fallen and the people of Arizona’s 8th District. And, frankly, we need to rally around each other.”

In one quick action, House Republicans postponed a vote this week that was certain to be divisive on repealing Obama’s health care overhaul. Debate over it last summer prompted threats and vandalism against lawmakers, including Giffords.

Instead, the House was poised to take up a resolution Wednesday supporting Giffords and the other shooting victims.

In Columbus, Ohio, on Monday, Boehner attended the swearing-in of a longtime friend, new Ohio Gov. John Kasich.

“It was a horrible tragedy,” Boehner said of the Tucson shootings. “I’m not going to say anything more than that.”

None of that prevented finger-pointing from the far sides of the political spectrum. Both the left and the right hurled accusations that the other was inciting violence. The suspect’s political leanings weren’t clear.

Some Democrats cast blame on the right-leaning tea party movement and Sarah Palin. She had told her followers “Don’t retreat; reload” last year and used crosshairs to denote congressional districts, including Giffords’, where she wanted Republicans to win.

Conservatives, in turn, said the left is just as nasty in its rhetoric. They pointed out that it was Obama who declared during the 2008 presidential campaign, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.”

Over the weekend, Obama said, “What Americans do at times of tragedy is to come together and support each other.”

The man accused of the shootings, 22-year-old Jared Loughner, appeared in court late Monday. He was ordered held without bail.

The night before the violence, Giffords was trying to show a peaceful path.

In an e-mail to a friend in Kentucky discussing how to “promote centrism and moderation,” she congratulated Republican Secretary of State Trey Grayson on his new position at Harvard University.

“After you get settled, I would love to talk about what we can do to promote centrism and moderation,” Giffords wrote. “I am one of only 12 Dems left in a GOP district (the only woman) and think that we need to figure out how to tone our rhetoric and partisanship down.”

Leadership Strategies, Health Care and Obama’s Mandate

Monday, March 22nd, 2010

obama_healthcare1The historic health care bill passed the House and is headed for the Senate. It is of great importance since one of the major criteria for measuring the effectiveness of a society is how those who are sick are treated.

Having only a portion of the population feeling they are being tended properly when they become ill indicates patterns of avoidance. As citizens we are all entitled to get effective treatment and know we are part of a larger community that values each of us.

I believe that Obama’s determination to pass this bill is, in part, his obligation as President of our country. I also believe there is a personal desire to right a wrong done to his mother when she was dying from cancer and spent much of her day fighting with insurance companies to have her treatment covered.

There are so many horror stories of people who have either died because of lack of money for treatment or those who have spent their life savings or gone bankrupt because of health issues. Perhaps this historic time will be a change in direction for our country that has become so polarized that conflict resolution seems almost impossible.

And yet, while there are those who still posture and choose to stand in the way of progress, the majority of us can take a deep breath knowing that our society is better for moving from avoidance to becoming initiators of a new way. When the pattern of avoider moves to initiator stagnant old patterns are cast aside and the healthy winds of change have an opportunity to bring fresh ideas to blossom.

Obama and his colleagues who have worked relentlessly to overcome the obstacles and fears of old ways of thinking and helped our country face rather than continue to avoid the idea that “we are all in it together and no one wins unless we all do” are to be congratulated.